|
Post by tomdex on Aug 17, 2022 8:45:20 GMT -6
Here's something weird: the "John Carr raped Maury Terry so he got revenge by framing Carr for Son of Sam" theory was, as far as I can tell, first promoted by a vehement pedophile ring "debunker". This guy has been at it online since the early 2000s under several names, including Roy Harrold (on Websleuths, discussing the Johnny Gosch case), Vindalf (under which he left a 1-star Amazon review of Nick Bryant's book The Franklin Scandal), fantasypopper (on Reddit, where he's made several baseless posts and comments to dispute pedophile ring connections to the Dean Corll and Johnny Gosch cases), and RDobbson (on Twitter). He also used to post on this very forum under the name mysteriouscourtier. Here he is on Twitter advancing that theory as far back as late 2020:Â
Perhaps Manny came up with that same theory independently, or he happened to come across RDobbson's postings and decided to adopt it. But I find it a little strange that Manny tried to promote the same obscure theory as a disinformationist who has quite literally made it his life's mission to "debunk" elite pedophile rings. And I couldn't necessarily say that the theory is false, but there is no evidence for it that I'm aware of. Why would you say, "used to post" here? I'm so happy that you missed me, and continue to be obsessed with me, young feller! I posted that "theory", right on this forum under "John and Michael Carr", Jan.21, 2021 @8:41a.m. Prof. Horan even "liked" it (so there, and neener-neener!)  Sheer speculation, and I've never claimed it was anything else. But John Paul Ranieri's story is highly suggestive of exactly such a speculation. You know he claims, that as a Junior in High School he was "raped in" to a cult by none other than his schoolmate John Carr, and that 3 other Juniors also suffered that fate. Ranieri doesn't name them, but it's no secret that Maury Terry was at the same High School for at least one year. Thus, and barring any further disclosures by Ranieri (names of the other victims), it's possible Maury Terry was one of them! Not to mention, Wheat Carr's oblique remark, that Maury Terry was motivated by a grudge over "things that happened in High School" (!)Considering Maury Terry's propensity for publicly engaging in outrageously slanderous rumor-mongering and even more outrageous public speculations, about OTHER people, I feel absolutely justified in publicly speculating about HIM in return. Can hardly think of a more deserving person, to be idly speculated about. Ed Sanders and his pederast buddies perhaps, but there's time for that still. Thank you for misrepresenting my life's work, yet again. You know, it really suggests that you must FEAR what I have to say...all your efforts to discredit my words via personal attacks on me. Har-dee-har! Hilarious, if true. You know that I was victimized by professional child pornographers as a young teen, and that I was later recruited by detectives from our Integrated Intelligence Unit (IIU), to assist them in their investigation of allegations about "satanic abuse cults" in our province. I worked with them, off & on, from 1988 to 1992, on that project. You may not like what I have to say about those subjects, but I did my best to serve my community and especially all victims of child sexual abuse (in whatever form), by donating hundreds of hours of my time and effort to those detectives. If I didn't think, that YOU believe you are also 'serving your community' and it's Survivors, by digging into all these old cases, I would be a lot less respectful in my replies to you. I'm no pedophile ring skeptic, I know about and understand the realities very well. I also understand the damage, that false & fraudulent speculations about that subject can cause. I've told you before, if you didn't live through it, there are some things about the history of that you just are not capable of understanding the same way as those who did. I'm sorry if that offends you, but it's a reality. You were not even an egg yet, when loony Diane Core proclaimed at a conference in Rome, that; "satanic cultists are pedophile gang members, and pedophile gang members are satranic cultists". Wildly popular theory with born-again & fundamentalist 'satan hunters', but a dangerously ignorant conjecture. At the time, we had victims and survivors of sexual abuse at Mount Cashel Orphanage trying to get ANYONE to listen to them and help them to get the Justice they deserved, (not to mention, stopping the cycle of moving clergy offenders around to abuse more kids somewhere else!). And no one wanted to hear them, least of all the media. Everyone already knew, "pedophiles are all satanists", so Catholic clergy and Lay Brothers couldn't possibly be responsible for abusing THOUSANDS of helpless children... I believe Maury and Wheaties only went to high school together freshman year, then Wheaties transferred out. I think that might throw a bit of a wrench into your little speculative theory.
|
|
|
Post by mysteriouscourtier on Aug 17, 2022 11:09:36 GMT -6
Tomdex said; "I believe Maury and Wheaties only went to high school together freshman year, then Wheaties transferred out. I think that might throw a bit of a wrench into your little speculative theory"
Yes. You say "freshmen", where I am we say "junior". It is the first year of High School.
But, I really could care less if that scenario turned out be impossible for whatever reason, or if Ranieri were to admit making it up, or whatever else debunked it. I'm not here to 'sell' anyone on any SOS & Maury Terry theories, at all. It's just an interesting idea, suggested by the story Ranieri told, which could explain Terry's obsessive desire to seduce a psychotic serial killer into hanging his crimes on other people, and then manufacturing a complex web of highly suggestive pseudo-evidence to help him "prove" that.
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Aug 17, 2022 18:52:44 GMT -6
Okay, that's enough of that.
Now, then: Sam Carr was born in Yonkers, but by the time he enlisted in the Army for WWII, he was living and working in Buffalo, NY. After his service, he moved his family between Buffalo, Yonkers, and the Bronx. John attended St Helena HS in the Bronx at least in 1961-62, but then, they moved back to Buffalo, where one source claims Sam ran the local Communist Party (in cahoots with the QLF.) John graduated from McKinley Vocational HS in Buffalo in 1966, then joined the USAF. Michael attended South Park HS in Buffalo at that time.
Wheat Carr was attending Commerce HS in Yonkers 1966-67, FWIW.
Sam and Frances bought the house on Warburton rrrriiiiiiggght around the time a collective of Dominican/Cuban/Puerto Rican commies bought the house (from Uncle Sucker hisself!) on Wicker that the Netos lived in. That's right kids--the Netos were some kind of double agents. Just. Like. The. Carrs. And Craig Glassman's Wackenhut/CIA bosses arranged for them all to live under the watchful eyes of 35 Pine Street.
Oh, and get this--they aren't even Irish. Their name is Czar. Shit you not. Sam's parents Michel and Michelina (as in, Wheat Michelina Carr) Czar were from Austria-Hungary. Juuuuuust llliiiike Manny's dad's grandparents (although they settled in Pittsburgh amidst other Hungarian Slovaks, including the Warholas and the Levendas.) And yes, Julia IS Sam's sister, and yes, THEY were the ones hauled in by the FBI over the Alger Hiss/Whittaker Chambers brouhaha. That's why Sam moved back to Buffalo--to "re"infiltrate his old QLF/KGB/etc friends to work off his "probation." That's why he was moved back to Yonkers. To be near the Netos and their pseudo-American friends. To run a phone messaging service for the KGB and their sleeper agents. One that was tapped by the FBI. That telephone-based signalling system in the Bronson movie Telefon? The Carrs ran that. Under the cover of a regular message service. All those wine bottles wrapped in 1958 newspapers in the Neto attic? Commies don't celebrate Xmas. They celebrate la Revolucion. In Cuba, that was in 1958. See? Mariah herself brags about being close to Castro personally. You think the FBI and CIA didn't know that? BTW, her daughter has a hilariously ironic job these days. Hilariously ironic. And that's what Wheat meant when she said she was sick of being an FBI informant. She was RAISED to be. It kept her parents out of the gas chamber.
|
|
|
Post by mysteriouscourtier on Aug 17, 2022 21:35:53 GMT -6
Okay, that's enough of that. Now, then: Sam Carr was born in Yonkers, but by the time he enlisted in the Army for WWII, he was living and working in Buffalo, NY. After his service, he moved his family between Buffalo, Yonkers, and the Bronx. John attended St Helena HS in the Bronx at least in 1961-62, but then, they moved back to Buffalo, where one source claims Sam ran the local Communist Party (in cahoots with the QLF.) John graduated from McKinley Vocational HS in Buffalo in 1966, then joined the USAF. Michael attended South Park HS in Buffalo at that time. Wheat Carr was attending Commerce HS in Yonkers 1966-67, FWIW. Sam and Frances bought the house on Warburton rrrriiiiiiggght around the time a collective of Dominican/Cuban/Puerto Rican commies bought the house (from Uncle Sucker hisself!) on Wicker that the Netos lived in. That's right kids--the Netos were some kind of double agents. Just. Like. The. Carrs. And Craig Glassman's Wackenhut/CIA bosses arranged for them all to live under the watchful eyes of 35 Pine Street. Oh, and get this--they aren't even Irish. Their name is Czar. Shit you not. Sam's parents Michel and Michelina (as in, Wheat Michelina Carr) Czar were from Austria-Hungary. Juuuuuust llliiiike Manny's dad's grandparents (although they settled in Pittsburgh amidst other Hungarian Slovaks, including the Warholas and the Levendas.) And yes, Julia IS Sam's sister, and yes, THEY were the ones hauled in by the FBI over the Alger Hiss/Whittaker Chambers brouhaha. That's why Sam moved back to Buffalo--to "re"infiltrate his old QLF/KGB/etc friends to work off his "probation." That's why he was moved back to Yonkers. To be near the Netos and their pseudo-American friends. To run a phone messaging service for the KGB and their sleeper agents. One that was tapped by the FBI. That telephone-based signalling system in the Bronson movie Telefon? The Carrs ran that. Under the cover of a regular message service. All those wine bottles wrapped in 1958 newspapers in the Neto attic? Commies don't celebrate Xmas. They celebrate la Revolucion. In Cuba, that was in 1958. See? Mariah herself brags about being close to Castro personally. You think the FBI and CIA didn't know that? BTW, her daughter has a hilariously ironic job these days. Hilariously ironic. And that's what Wheat meant when she said she was sick of being an FBI informant. She was RAISED to be. It kept her parents out of the gas chamber. Thank you for clarifying. In Ultimate Evil, in my edition page 223, (Into the Maze), Maury Terry says that he attended the same High School as John Carr, in his freshman year.
|
|
|
Post by marionumber1 on Aug 18, 2022 2:09:10 GMT -6
I'm so happy that you missed me, and continue to be obsessed with me, young feller! "obsessed" like replying to a comment of mine in a nearly-year-old Reddit thread, or making public posts about how you suspect I'm QAnon? I have called out your work on its merits (or rather lack thereof) on many occasions. That's not a personal attack. You have a record of asserting unproven conjectures as fact (e.g. your bizarre claim that Johnny Gosch was killed in 1990 by "rival drug dealers") and flagrantly misrepresenting what documents say (e.g. many of your dishonest comments in this thread on Dean Corll trying to debunk the connection to a pedophile ring). To be clear, I don't "fear" what you have to say because it has any validity. I have issues with it because it is false yet superficially convincing to skeptical outsiders who haven't studied these cases in depth. People who are just learning about a pedophile ring case like Franklin or Johnny Gosch's abduction might see your writings and use that as a reason to label the whole story a hoax, unless they see a good rebuttal. I feel for what you went through as a teen and respect your belief that you're doing good work on this important issue. You do sometimes have valuable insights, and have dug up facts that are informative to me or made me see cases in a different light. There are also reasonable concerns about many of the people you call out, like John DeCamp, Ted Gunderson, and even Maury Terry to an extent. And I have always felt that fundamentalist wingnuts in the community overblew the satanic aspect (despite my belief that it is a real part of these cases), and downplayed the Christian aspect. But the other side of things comes in exchanges like the ones I've highlighted above on Johnny Gosch and Dean Corll; where you appear to simply not be engaging in good faith, but rather ignoring and manipulating evidence so that you can debunk a case you have predetermined was false. I never took the satanism angle at face value, nor did I throw it out completely. Any statement from a David Berkowitz or Henry Lee Lucas is going to be filled with bullshit of various kinds, be it intentionally self-serving or just a byproduct of their screwed-up mental state. It has always been a matter of sifting through to see which parts might have some validity to them. There is enough evidence in both cases for me to believe that Berkowitz and Lucas both were members of cults, that these cults directed many of the crimes they were involved in, and that the cults employed the trappings of satanism. That does not mean I think either killer was a Satanic Bible-thumping true believer, but that the cults engaged in dark, sadistic rituals which they implicitly or explicitly passed off as "satanic". Indeed, the Professor has previously highlighted certain Christian cults (like the Holy Order of MANS and The Way International) which may have important roles to play in these stories. The satanism angle is irrelevant to me except to that extent that a group's ritual practices serve to explain its social dynamics and actions. What is really going on here is simply organized crime and sexual exploitation, backed by some fairly influential benefactors.
|
|
|
Post by marionumber1 on Aug 18, 2022 2:54:11 GMT -6
Now, then: Sam Carr was born in Yonkers, but by the time he enlisted in the Army for WWII, he was living and working in Buffalo, NY. After his service, he moved his family between Buffalo, Yonkers, and the Bronx. John attended St Helena HS in the Bronx at least in 1961-62, but then, they moved back to Buffalo, where one source claims Sam ran the local Communist Party (in cahoots with the QLF.) John graduated from McKinley Vocational HS in Buffalo in 1966, then joined the USAF. Michael attended South Park HS in Buffalo at that time. Do you have more information that you're able to share about Quebec Liberation Front (FLQ) activities in New York? There are some interesting things I recently learned about the JFK and MLK assassinations which might be tied to that milieu. James Earl Ray had a handler named "Raoul", who he met in Quebec (at a bar in Montreal) and for whom he began smuggling weapons across the border in exchange for money. Assassination researcher William Pepper actually identified "Raoul" as a New York resident named Raul Coelho, and he had at least one other witness confirming Raul's involvement in gunrunning. Pepper stated on a podcast that Raul was a Portuguese military intelligence officer who immigrated to the US in 1959, where he began working at the General Motors plant in North Tarrytown (am I misremembering, or did that GM plant come up in relation to the Son of Sam cult?) and got a home in.......Yonkers. Meanwhile, Lee Harvey Oswald was also reported to have made a Montreal trip, "at the time the FLQ terrorists were placing bombs in that city". The FLQ aspect was quickly disavowed in a follow-up but I have to wonder... Given Oswald's apparent role as an infiltrator/provocateur into US-based "far left" groups like the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, I wonder if he was doing the same thing for the FLQ as well. And of course, Professor, that parallels what Sam Carr seems to have been up to...
|
|
gv889
New Member
Posts: 39
|
Post by gv889 on Aug 18, 2022 6:34:53 GMT -6
I apologize if this is already known but Manny Grossman went to school with the killer of Mr. Real estate Below is Manny at the far left of middle row while future killer is top row between the kid with plaid shirt and the asian kid. I was under the Impression according to Maury Terry Mr RE was James P Donovan of Pound Ridge NY. Alfred Hunt Howell was not Mr Real Estate!
|
|
|
Post by marionumber1 on Aug 18, 2022 12:17:20 GMT -6
Not Qanon - Q himself! I thought you were an excellent candidate, for that. But you're not. Pales in comparison to your having systematically collected every false & slanderous attack on me, over my 25 years of pissing off conspiracy nuts online, and giving them their own special listing on your site. Whatever - I'm sure you're really very nice, as am I. Most of what I've documented has been your own (false) statements about these cases. I'm interested to hear how your practices, such as falsely claiming I worked for the NSA, accusing me in the same breath of wanting these pedophile networks to be real, stating that I am engaged in "anti-gay witch-hunting", and implying that me or a research associate possesses child pornography, would "pale in comparison". I haven't seen anything indicating that Noreen "was convinced" that the deceased John E. Gosch was Johnny. She may have entertained it briefly, and she commented on the spooky coincidence of the birth date, but I haven't seen her endorsing the idea that it was him. If she ever did, she certainly didn't believe it for very long; and the news articles make clear that a Tacoma WA family identified him as their adopted son. You're free to believe whatever you want, but it's pretty disturbing that you've asserted it as absolute fact (there are no qualifiers in your statement) with virtually no evidence to back it up and the circumstances in the articles you cite contradicting it. Then you ask the people who doubt you to disprove your claim, but that's not how it works; the burden is on you to have the evidence before you start making these assertions. I don't see any particular reason to doubt those accounts from Noreen and Paul. Johnny maintaining limited communication with Franklin survivors and with his mother does not mean that he is out publicly in a manner that would resolve his abduction with police. Plus they may not know where Johnny is even if he does communicate with them. So yes, he is officially still a missing person (a former missing child) even if he has been in touch with certain people, and will continue to be one until/unless he comes out publicly.
|
|
|
Post by mysteriouscourtier on Aug 19, 2022 11:06:13 GMT -6
Not Qanon - Q himself! I thought you were an excellent candidate, for that. But you're not. Pales in comparison to your having systematically collected every false & slanderous attack on me, over my 25 years of pissing off conspiracy nuts online, and giving them their own special listing on your site. Whatever - I'm sure you're really very nice, as am I. Most of what I've documented has been your own (false) statements about these cases. I'm interested to hear how your practices, such as falsely claiming I worked for the NSA, accusing me in the same breath of wanting these pedophile networks to be real, stating that I am engaged in "anti-gay witch-hunting", and implying that me or a research associate possesses child pornography, would "pale in comparison". I haven't seen anything indicating that Noreen "was convinced" that the deceased John E. Gosch was Johnny. She may have entertained it briefly, and she commented on the spooky coincidence of the birth date, but I haven't seen her endorsing the idea that it was him. If she ever did, she certainly didn't believe it for very long; and the news articles make clear that a Tacoma WA family identified him as their adopted son. You're free to believe whatever you want, but it's pretty disturbing that you've asserted it as absolute fact (there are no qualifiers in your statement) with virtually no evidence to back it up and the circumstances in the articles you cite contradicting it. Then you ask the people who doubt you to disprove your claim, but that's not how it works; the burden is on you to have the evidence before you start making these assertions. I don't see any particular reason to doubt those accounts from Noreen and Paul. Johnny maintaining limited communication with Franklin survivors and with his mother does not mean that he is out publicly in a manner that would resolve his abduction with police. Plus they may not know where Johnny is even if he does communicate with them. So yes, he is officially still a missing person (a former missing child) even if he has been in touch with certain people, and will continue to be one until/unless he comes out publicly. I see that you have now decided that "cppweb" or "ccpweb" posting on Websleuths was really "Jimmy" - whomever that was. Have you removed the false allegations that I posted to websleuths under that username, and others, while simultaneously posting under my own name? Have you apologized for promoting such slanderous conjectures? Remove all the false allegations and slanderous conjectures about me from your site, and I will stop promoting conjectures about you. That's how it works. I'm a bit surprised by your lack of intellectual curiosity, about John E. Gosch. There's a lot more than just the coincidence of names and dates of birth. There is, yes, the claim by someone in Tacoma Wa. that the deceased man was their ADOPTED son. Adopted, apparently, in Colorado - or at least that's where the adoption papers were certified. In Colorado, where you state the post-abduction "proof of life" about John G were found. Supposedly, the adoption papers state John E was adopted two years prior to John G going missing, but if someone was creating false adoption papers they could put whatever date they wished, on them. Then there is the fact of John E being reported a runaway at age 16, and the "coincidence" of Jimmy Gibson stating (in the AMW broadcast) that he met John G when they were both aged 16. John G didn't say anything to him about being abducted, John G told Jimmy he was a runaway as Jimmy was. Later at Jimmy Gibson's father's house, Gibson's father calls Noreen and they mutually agree that the Johnny Gosch staying in his basement is Noreen's son John G. Gibson's father tells John G to go home, and he leaves. At that point, John G is NOT under the control of a pedo ring (if he ever was), and free to do whatever he pleases. But he doesn't "go home" to Iowa, he doesn't even contact Noreen or John sr. Why not? Perhaps because "home" has been some other place since he was 12, a place that he had reasons to run away from? And with all your antipathy toward John sr. it never occurred to you, that men who travel a lot in their work sometimes have a second, unofficial, family somewhere else in the country? And how expensive it could be to fight a custody battle with someone you've fallen out of love with, and no guarantee that you would win it? And that, there might be another option...?
|
|
|
Post by marionumber1 on Aug 19, 2022 12:23:42 GMT -6
I see that you have now decided that "cppweb" or "ccpweb" posting on Websleuths was really "Jimmy" - whomever that was. Have you removed the false allegations that I posted to websleuths under that username, and others, while simultaneously posting under my own name? Have you apologized for promoting such slanderous conjectures? Remove all the false allegations and slanderous conjectures about me from your site, and I will stop promoting conjectures about you. That's how it works. Sure, I should have removed the references to other people (not myself) claiming that you were cppweb once I realized it was most likely Jimmy Gibson. Apologies for that, and I will do so, but linking to an erroneous belief by others does not constitute an endorsement on my part. (After all, that same section of my website has plenty of links to your erroneous beliefs, and I don't endorse them by any means.) It does not remotely compare to you making outright statements of fact that falsely accuse me of working for US intelligence and all but claim I am pro-pedophile and/or anti-gay. You're really saying that it's okay for you to claim all of those false, and actually slanderous, things about me because I referenced some people who wrongly connected you to a Websleuths user name? Your theory could possibly be true. Despite my belief in Johnny being taken by the Franklin ring, I have never ruled out the possibility of something else happening, though any alternative possibility would need to explain and convincingly prove how Paul Bonacci learned the information he did. Just a clarification of facts, though: Johnny Gosch is John D. Gosch (his middle name being David), not John G. Gosch. Also, are you sure that John E. Gosch left home at age 16? An article I found indicated that it happened at age 18, so it would have likely been in 1988, well after Jimmy claimed he met Johnny. The problem is that rather than acknowledging your theory as one possibility, you asserted it as the definitive reality of what happened to Johnny ("Tragically Johnny Gosch was executed by rival drug dealers in Yuma, Arizona in 1990"). You don't get to wiggle out of that now; you have a habit, when writing about pedophile ring cases, of elevating your personal opinions and hypotheses to unjustifiable claims of fact. In any case, this is definitely distracting from the actual topic of the thread (Manny Grossman's videos on Sam of Sam). If we are going to be continuing our "discussion", it should probably not be on this thread anymore.
|
|
|
Post by mysteriouscourtier on Aug 20, 2022 11:54:47 GMT -6
I see that you have now decided that "cppweb" or "ccpweb" posting on Websleuths was really "Jimmy" - whomever that was. Have you removed the false allegations that I posted to websleuths under that username, and others, while simultaneously posting under my own name? Have you apologized for promoting such slanderous conjectures? Remove all the false allegations and slanderous conjectures about me from your site, and I will stop promoting conjectures about you. That's how it works. Sure, I should have removed the references to other people (not myself) claiming that you were cppweb once I realized it was most likely Jimmy Gibson. Apologies for that, and I will do so, but linking to an erroneous belief by others does not constitute an endorsement on my part. (After all, that same section of my website has plenty of links to your erroneous beliefs, and I don't endorse them by any means.) It does not remotely compare to you making outright statements of fact that falsely accuse me of working for US intelligence and all but claim I am pro-pedophile and/or anti-gay. You're really saying that it's okay for you to claim all of those false, and actually slanderous, things about me because I referenced some people who wrongly connected you to a Websleuths user name? Your theory could possibly be true. Despite my belief in Johnny being taken by the Franklin ring, I have never ruled out the possibility of something else happening, though any alternative possibility would need to explain and convincingly prove how Paul Bonacci learned the information he did. Just a clarification of facts, though: Johnny Gosch is John D. Gosch (his middle name being David), not John G. Gosch. Also, are you sure that John E. Gosch left home at age 16? An article I found indicated that it happened at age 18, so it would have likely been in 1988, well after Jimmy claimed he met Johnny. The problem is that rather than acknowledging your theory as one possibility, you asserted it as the definitive reality of what happened to Johnny ("Tragically Johnny Gosch was executed by rival drug dealers in Yuma, Arizona in 1990"). You don't get to wiggle out of that now; you have a habit, when writing about pedophile ring cases, of elevating your personal opinions and hypotheses to unjustifiable claims of fact. In any case, this is definitely distracting from the actual topic of the thread (Manny Grossman's videos on Sam of Sam). If we are going to be continuing our "discussion", it should probably not be on this thread anymore. Agreed, and so this will be my last "off-topic" post in this thread. When you have launched an unprovoked (by attacks on you) full-scale attack on someone, via your site, expecting any response to be "in kind" and "proportionate" might be a wee bit NAIVE. However, I am a "person of good faith", and so I have reset my Twitter account. Those things that distress you now exist only in your screen-shots of them. Your move. I can't access that news site, but John E could not have been reported a runaway - as indicated in other reports - if he had left home at 18. In any case, conflicting reports would only indicate a need for a thorough investigation of the real facts. But that will never happen, so long as The Johnny Gosch Case remains nothing more than a vehicle for promoting Paul Bonacci - and that is all it has been since John DeCamp revealed that his young operative supposedly "had information" about the case. And we both know, that you require Bonacci to be a 100% reliable witness, so that you (and others) can exploit his many other claims as the foundation for a Grand United Theory of child sex-trafficking in America.
|
|
|
Post by barney on Aug 24, 2022 7:47:42 GMT -6
Now, then: Sam Carr was born in Yonkers, but by the time he enlisted in the Army for WWII, he was living and working in Buffalo, NY. After his service, he moved his family between Buffalo, Yonkers, and the Bronx. John attended St Helena HS in the Bronx at least in 1961-62, but then, they moved back to Buffalo, where one source claims Sam ran the local Communist Party (in cahoots with the QLF.) John graduated from McKinley Vocational HS in Buffalo in 1966, then joined the USAF. Michael attended South Park HS in Buffalo at that time. Do you have more information that you're able to share about Quebec Liberation Front (FLQ) activities in New York? There are some interesting things I recently learned about the JFK and MLK assassinations which might be tied to that milieu. James Earl Ray had a handler named "Raoul", who he met in Quebec (at a bar in Montreal) and for whom he began smuggling weapons across the border in exchange for money. Assassination researcher William Pepper actually identified "Raoul" as a New York resident named Raul Coelho, and he had at least one other witness confirming Raul's involvement in gunrunning. Pepper stated on a podcast that Raul was a Portuguese military intelligence officer who immigrated to the US in 1959, where he began working at the General Motors plant in North Tarrytown (am I misremembering, or did that GM plant come up in relation to the Son of Sam cult?) and got a home in.......Yonkers. Meanwhile, Lee Harvey Oswald was also reported to have made a Montreal trip, "at the time the FLQ terrorists were placing bombs in that city". The FLQ aspect was quickly disavowed in a follow-up but I have to wonder... Given Oswald's apparent role as an infiltrator/provocateur into US-based "far left" groups like the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, I wonder if he was doing the same thing for the FLQ as well. And of course, Professor, that parallels what Sam Carr seems to have been up to...
|
|
|
Post by barney on Aug 24, 2022 7:56:37 GMT -6
Montreal has long been a base for espionage against the United States. John Wilkes Booth and his confederates (no pun intended) walked around Montreal like they owned the place. The bank of Montreal was said to has supplied funds for the logistics in the killing of Abraham Lincoln. And Judah P. Benjamin fled to Montreal after the Lincoln killing and from Montreal he sailed to London where he became a barrister to the Queen of England.
In the 1960's Montreal was home to a shadowy group called Permindex which included Clay Shaw the New Orleans Director of the Trade Mart as one of their directors. A man named Louis Mortimer Bloomfield a lawyer for the Bronfman family was said to be the key figure. It is said both Shaw and Ferrie made regular trips to Montreal and after the Kennedy murder a Canadian man, an insurance agent over heard several men at the Winnipeg Airport discussing the success of the assassination. The men noticed this Canuck listening to them and began to follow him around the airport. I believe he used a pay phone to contact authorities and the men left. He identified one of the men as Clay Shaw and the other David Ferrie who was a pilot. As an interesting experiment it's fun to use the surname Booth with the city of London. What comes up is the number of Mayors for the city of London with the surname Booth.
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Aug 25, 2022 10:28:47 GMT -6
Pun ovationed, anyway.
|
|