Mike Davis Interview, The Fight At Sue's

Frank D. asked LE if they had talked to the people who used to live in 16 because Dana used to visit there.

Mike and Barb moved to 16 on 1/1/81 and Judith Lynt moved out 12/80. Was Dana visiting Cabin 16 because he was seeing Maggie K (who lived behind the Sharps) at that time and she was friends with Judith’s daughter? School counselor said Maggie was Dana’s girlfriend before Sheila

Whatever the reason it appears he was seen at Judith’s cabin. Not sure how long she lived there but apparently she lived there for a month after Sue moved in -,so he and Johnny may have become even better friends due to that.

Judith said Tina and Ricky visited her cabin but she didn’t know Sue and her son had spent the night at 28 two weeks before the murders (by this time she was living at Hy Walkes in old Keddie probably in a rental)

It appears that Judith’s daughter was not Maggie’s age but closer to Susan Krois’s age so I wonder if Susan and Larhonda were actually spending the night at Judith’s house with her daughter and Maggie was there also (maybe as a baby sitter?).

If Chuck had a party at or near his house (the Walke property where Judith also lived) then maybe she went to the party then stayed at Judith’s house afterwards? Maggie was supposedly Chucks girlfriend and former girlfriend of Dana.

Just trying to place where these people were.

Dana questioning or spreading rumors that Sheila’s baby could be his? Makes sense if they were ‘dating’. Did Sheila (maybe with the help of a few friends) set up Dana to teach him a lesson and things got out of hand. I’m throwing it out there that it was Dana that was the main target that night. I’m on the fence as to whether it was premeditated but once the frenzy started it was unstoppable.

Here is the report from the counselor's statement. I wonder what page 1 said and if there was more at the bottom of this page, since it's cropped off.

In the prevailing theory, this statement by Mike Davis is made up. It is said to be a "reverse alibi". A story created by Mike, Martell, and Tony the Greek. The reason? Because Tony was really the man fighting with Sue that day. They told LE Sue was fighting with a man that looked like Avery Schreiber, that way if anyone else came forward about the fight they would already have this "reverse alibi" established and LE would believe the man was someone besides Tony.

This makes no sense. So, Mike came forward with this information, purposely bringing the fight to law enforcement's attention because in reality they didn't want LE to know the man fighting with Sue was their friend.

Wouldn't it make more sense to not bring it to LE's attention at all? Deny seeing a fight or this man if anyone else did happen to mention it to LE? The date on the report is 6/4/81. Almost 2 months after the murders. You would think they wouldn't be worried about someone else coming to LE with the story first at this point. Not creating some ridiculous reverse alibi to get a jump on a story 2 months after the murders. Completely unnecessary & ridiculous.

Not to mention his statement was quite detail oriented to be made up. I personally feel he was being truthful in his statement. Also, the Avery Schreiber comparison must have been said during the documentary? In this initial he states the man did not have a mustache & never mentions Avery Schreiber. Also, some people in Keddie said they did see a green & white blazer at the Sharps, when questioned after Davis gave his statement. And who lived in cabin 16 prior to January 81, that Dana was often visiting? Did the Albins have record of this? They should have.

Where is the evidence making it ok to publicly call out Tony as a murderer? Fingerprints, DNA, was he spotted in Keddie that night, act suspicious afterwards? No, none of this exists.

Supposedly resembling someone else & being friends with people is not evidence. Mike & Martell, what did they do to get named as well? Come forward with a story? That makes them co-conspirators to a murder? It's unbelievable people can be publicly named as involved in a quadruple homicide without one shred of evidence.

And I just have to say, it's not nice to call someone a murderer based on their appearance. Lots of people have similar looks. Especially if the look & style was popular during that era. Case in point:

_     

🤣 The irony of the sketch & newspaper photo! I never would have picked up on it but that's the way those 2 photos were saved together on another site! Uncanny & funny!