|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Apr 26, 2015 21:17:59 GMT -6
Graysmith tried to twist everything about this memo to make it fit Arthur Leigh Allen as the killer of Paul Stine and to make it "verify" various baloney claims made in two "Zodiac" letters. But it's clear that the man Fouke saw could not have been the killer.  |
|
ekh
Junior Member
Orders accepted.
Posts: 90 
|
Post by ekh on May 22, 2018 10:18:31 GMT -6
Interesting to note the Oct 13th letter, the one with a piece of the shirt, didn't mention the "goof." You would think he would have mentioned it right away. It wasn't until the Nov 9th "death machine" letter that he mentions the "goof." The memo is dated Nov 12th. My question is, how did the letter writer found out about this "goof?" I wonder if it was an open secret in the department.
|
|
ekh
Junior Member
Orders accepted.
Posts: 90
|
Post by ekh on May 22, 2018 21:50:11 GMT -6
I wonder if it was a topic of discussion in the October conference and someone didn't like the "solution" of not mentioning it to the public.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Jun 16, 2018 11:30:56 GMT -6
A Chronicle reporter knew, on the night of the shooting, that police had seen a possible suspect heading into the park (this is no doubt the report that prompted police to send search units to the park.) This is the same person I say took the trip sheet and pieces of the shirt. Does that mean the letter writer did not get HIS pieces of shirt from that reporter?
Well, remember, "Zodiac" does not mention the "suspect" known by police to have left BRS slowly and quietly until the SECOND BRS-related letter. So, waiting until the SECOND Stine letter to mention the "other" suspect is not necessarily a break from his pattern.
|
|
