|
Post by Admin Horan on Feb 2, 2017 13:43:53 GMT -6
I think some people are getting the wrong idea. I'm NOT saying I have "solved" ANY of these murders. I've only pointed out that, contrary to the Myth, LE did, in fact, have GOOD suspects in each of these murders.
In any case, there is ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO evidence of ANY KIND AT ALL that Larry Kane, Gaikowsky, or any of the other horseshit "suspects" had ANY THING WHATSOEVER to do with ANY of theses murders. PERIOD. Do some of them sort of kind of fit the horseshit "profile" of the MYTHOLOGICAL "Zodiac Killer?" Maybe. But that's like saying they fit the profile of Batman or Santa Claus. The Kathleen Johns horseshit Is JUST PART OF THE MYTH. (Michael Butterfield has done a pretty good job of debunking that one by himself.) So, when the FACTS are supposedly "contradicted" by horseshit, that DOES NOT DISPROVE THE FACTS.
I can't MAKE people prefer FACTS over HORSESHIT. What I can do, however, is point out horseshit EVERY TIME I SEE IT.
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Feb 24, 2017 9:54:06 GMT -6
[This question was originally posted by Captain Obvious]
I'm curious as to why Land didn't finish killing Hartnell when he found him and picked him up. Did he want Hartnell to survive to give a description of the attacker's hood? I think maybe he had already cleaned up and changed clothes and accepted the risk of being identified but wasn't.
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Feb 24, 2017 9:54:31 GMT -6
Captain:
Now THAT'S a darned good question. All I know is, Land was a suspect. So was his brother Ray. And Dennis did everything he could to or make himself look suspicious.
Let's say Dennis did it. When he's dispatched to the scene, he expects both kids to be dead. Instead, he sees Bryan crawling along the road. How, exactly, is he going to kill him? If he has any brains at all, he's gotten rid of the murder weapon, or at least stashed it somewhere. So, he can't kill Bryan with a SECOND weapon. That would look odd. See? Of course, it doesn't really matter to me if Dennis Land did it or not. Even if he didn't, that doesn't prove the letters weren't a hoax. My point is, there were good suspects in these murders who Graysmith pretended didn't exist.
There is, of course, one small but interesting detail about that part of the Berryessa story that most people have overlooked . . .
|
|