And, why not talk to Pedrini? So many people to be talking to. But, Dmac won't talk to anyone?? Vickie won't either? Shut up Vickie. We know what side your bread is buttered on. No offense lol (I heard it's better if I add an lol.) Has she interviewed anyone but Dmac? Glad he's having an awesome trip but STFU if you're only in it for the money. Give me some real journalisim. Can't hardly wait for the new Pluma update. Ish. But, you know what? You do you, Vickie. You do you. Old fart. Carry on. Ish. Zero stars.
He can't talk to Pedrini because then he might not be able to squeeze him into the circle. It's easier to assume what he was up to than to really find out or to talk from afar like he did with Dana's sister - can't believe he posted that syrupy(?) exchange he had with her. It was completely disgusting.
8 Oct-- Looking at FR CS Reports (FR= First Responder; CS= Crime Scene), let's set up a series of lies: Sheila said she woke about 6am and nobody else was awake. She waited until others were awake to return her bedding home, which was at 8am. We know from reports Zonita was in her PJs, so Sheila waited for the dominant present in that household to be awake before strolling over to open the door at 28 to discover more carnage than she'd hoped for. AMAZING nobody picked up on this, she waited two full hours so she could put on her little play. And, again, where in CS photos or complete contemporary interviews from witnesses explaining away the absence of Sheila's bedroll?
Hoping to make this brief! From memory, Sheila said very little about why she went home and what she brought with her. She was going to church. Getting clothes. Curling iron. Pretty direct answers. What is this bedroll dmac speaks of? lol Did he think she owned a sleepingbag?
Without any of us repeating what we've heard from dmac, what are the answers to these 3 questions:
1. What time did Sheila wake up/go home? (dmac puts it at her waking up at 6 am and going home at 8. My feeling is she woke up about 7:50 and was home about 8:15. Does that sound right?) On the audio dmac has up, I think Sheila says, "I called my uncle". 2. What did she bring home? Could it have been whatever she slept in rolled up in a ball? That's how I traveled at that age. haha But, making this into a bedroll? Nah. 3. What was she getting? I heard clothes for church and a curling iron.
Dmac's writing gives me a headache so I'm guilty of scanning his stuff. lol
If anyone is looking for a bedroll in those pictures, they're not going to find one.
6 Sept-- Speaking of DNA, multiple reports show DNA found on Sue's bindings are consistent with Sue as well as a minor female contributor. I believe Loon bound the victims, at least Sue. I've been staring for days at the pink cloth ligature found at C18 and believe it is consistent with Tina being bound at the wrists. So much for my idea she was removed from the scene to avoid the bloodbath which followed. The only thing we know is she was removed to confuse the scene, the very focus of the investigation. And LE played along as participants in the murders.
None of this is true.
A "minor female contributor"? That makes it Loon. Got it. What about Tina? Going far left here, but those gags on Sue... Tina was a young 12. This was really over kill with gags. If someone told Tina to gag her mother, would she do it until she was told to stop? That's a lot of layers.
Did Tina help? Poor Tina. Such a mystery. Anyways, I don't think this DNA can be labeled MFC.
I can't even tell who dmac is blaming any more there are so many.
I could only scan that post as well jmo. His description of Sheila waking up early with Christmas morning delight "hoping her entire family was dead" and daydreaming about her new found freedom for 2 hours....jeeze. That is a lot of speculation. I guess the photo kmik posted of Sheila's bedding crumbled up in that ball on the front porch of 28 wasn't enough to substantiate her "alibi"?
In it he discusses a 2nd DNA match which he cannot name. I would think if it was Marilyn he wouldn't hold back on saying so. I too have wondered if it did belong to Tina (or one of the other kids).
The "minor female DNA" he is currently discussing on fb sounds like it could be different than the 2nd positive match mentioned in the above link? With the way he says "minor ", I'm not sure if he means minor as in underage or as in a small amount of DNA. If he means it is just a small sample then I would think they could still obtain a partial profile which could still possibly rule Marilyn in or out as the contributor.
I thought Dana's baby hadn't been born at the time of the murders? We've discussed the girls possibly planning to sneak out in the past, and I thinks it's very possible the light would be turned out for that. And I seem to recall reading somewhere sheila confirmed she and Alyssa had been planning on sneaking out to a party. I think that's why they ended up sleeping in the living room, either 1)it was somehow easier to sneak out that way or 2) someone busted them and made em sleep in the living room. But...I'm pretty sure Alyssa would have known her dad would be leaving super early. And the basement seems like the easier way.
I think you are right about the light bulb Snoho. If Sheila did unscrew that bulb that was more likely the reason why. Or perhaps she was the one who replaced the light bulb last, leaving the print, & somebody else unscrewed it that night while wearing gloves. I just read a research article that found recognizable latent prints can remain on light bulbs after temperatures of up to 156° C and after use of 672 hours. Definitely not proof of anything
Soho, thank you. It’s an awkwardly worded sentence, IMO. You would think that, perhaps, several other words could/should have been used ... trace amount, small amount... to replace the word minor... especially in a case that involved children (minors). Why muddle the water?
Exactly. His writing is sloppy. If D's writing is this muddled and he has nothing but time on his hands on vacay in his RV, he really shouldn't be judging every single word that every single person said/wrote without taking into consideration that they were all under a whole lotta stress. Yet, here is D, making mistakes of his own. He makes "mistakes" like that by weasling in other words. So, thank you for correcting me. I do think the "minor" means trace amount. See? This is what I like about this board. When somebody starts going down a rabbit hole, someone else throws them a rope! Appreciated! (Remember the disco suits, people?) Smoke and mirrors
Why does D never get after Gam? After all, he's had all this stuff since the early 1700s. (Now, that's sloppy writing! haha) But, seriously, Gam has been on this and in this since when? Nineteen eighty one? #amiwrong #stillwaitingonthatarticle
Sex Offenders: sure are lot of them running around. And it bothered me alleged drug dealers were tossed out while pervs remained welcome in Keddie. "20 Julian Rivera Single 0 Since before 4/1/78." He tried to rape another inhabitant, and lived in Keddie for years after the fact.