|
Post by kmik on Oct 24, 2020 20:10:54 GMT -6
Here's the link to Meanie's Keddie forum. She offered us (which amounted to about 5 of us), as Tom has, the great opportunity of expressing our thoughts regardless if she agreed or not - she was a rational thinker - and I truly miss her thoughts on the case. If you read it you'll notice when the great demise (dmac) came to the forum. He first posted under a different name which did little to conceal his identity -
www.tapatalk.com/groups/cabin28/index.php
|
|
|
Post by hope on Oct 24, 2020 20:39:54 GMT -6
Thanks kmik! I remember seeing him do that, and with Mean Kitty's forum, you guys had some really good conversations going on at that point too. Glad Tom opened his forum up. Going to head over to Meanies and re-read the old posts, I remember her having some good stuff on there. It is a shame : (
|
|
|
Post by raemen2 on Oct 25, 2020 6:21:40 GMT -6
I just don’t see any evidence of Bo and Marty being valuable( or untouchable) to anyone. In fact, if they were responsible for the slaughter of 3 children and a woman, leaving behind 3 witnesses that could easily ID them... well, they just became a HUGE liability to whatever criminal pipelines have been theorized over the years. It would be really easy to make these two fall of the face of the earth.
|
|
|
Post by karis on Oct 25, 2020 7:15:45 GMT -6
Raemen you are right. According to his theory the "criminal pipeline" left so many witnesses alive, it is laughable to me that anyone could believe this. And he keeps dragging in more to complete his theory. Besides that, there is no EVIDENCE against them. And if he really believes what he is publically posting, I don't think I would let anyone know that I was in Quincy, "outing" them!!
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Jan 6, 2021 22:36:26 GMT -6
If PCSO "developing" DNA evidence on Marty is supposed to mean that in 2013 Marty's DNA was located at the crime scene they why - 8 years later - are we still wondering who committed the Keddie Murders? There's no possible way PCSO needlessly spent money on a case that they had already solved - and no possible way they needlessly spent money trying to get enough evidence to take a dead man to court. All they had to do was stamp it "solved" and who was gonna argue??
There's also no way that Dmac thinks he's hit paydirt, BUT, instead of calling up Mike or Greg (or the new Sheriff), has opted to twiddle his thumbs lounging around the RV pecking out long rambling posts on Dee, Tony, Wade, and Marilyn until he can get the opportunity to ask someone about this magnificent find. Does he not have a phone? No gas? No email? Gosh if I thought I'd just located the smoking gun I would have ran to Mike's house - and so would he
|
|
|
Post by hope on Jan 13, 2021 2:04:33 GMT -6
Yes, I found that strange as well. Marty's DNA at the crime scene would be a slam dunk. They have already publically named him as responsible so why wouldn't mention they have a positive DNA match in addition to the circumstantial evidence always mentioned? They could have announced the DNA and that they are still looking into his accomplices. And you are right, why would they spend money if they already had what they needed to close the case? Why request help from Vidocq? And why wouldn't Gamberg or Hagwood inform dmac about it? You would think a DNA match would be an exciting event for them and worth sharing with 28.
I suppose the location of where this DNA was found would make a difference. Perhaps it was found somewhere outside of the main crime scene? It would be nice to have a DNA match. But I'm not sure that is the case here.
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Jan 13, 2021 21:58:29 GMT -6
Marty's name was all over the "bogus bloody glass" story but his prints were not.
from dmac's recent post:
This "info" is from old posts over the years but nobody ever said he confessed. Richard Meeks may have "claimed" that Marty's kids were going to meet with him and Sheila and tell them everything Marty confessed until their Uncle Spencer put a stop to it - but the funny thing is according to Mike G's "files" Sheila didn't seem to remember much about that when the police questioned her. How could she not remember such memorable information? Either Richard made more of it than it actually was or Sheila lied to Richard about them wanting to meet with her (both great reasons for convenient amnesia). You may remember that Marty's last wife joined the forum in 2013 or 14 (?) and said these murders bothered Marty till he died but she certainly never said he made any kind of deathbed confession - just dmac twisting words once again.
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Jan 25, 2021 18:52:31 GMT -6
Can someone please tell me how it was easier to type this lengthy post than to actually post the "Three Page Typed Report?" Was he concerned his followers couldn't follow what the report was saying or was he worried some would understand it too well? I understand it enough to say he doesn't want anyone to see the full report.
Keddie 28 FB post: As far as I know Glenna wasn't married- so who was her man? Maybe we're not getting the "whole picture" because it would just answers too many questions - and we certainly wouldn't want that. His failure to produce is kinda like Rick's silence - it speaks volumns
|
|
getem
Junior Member
Posts: 57
|
Post by getem on Jan 25, 2021 20:46:15 GMT -6
It's completely obvious (my opinion) that he's only posting is "versions" of the documents. Otherwise why not just dump the whole load? I can't think they're secret, because he does post a few select documents. I think the rest just tear his theory to shreds and he can't have that. He disgusts me.
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Jan 25, 2021 21:39:24 GMT -6
Couldn't agree more! And he's posting (retelling) a lot of the same things he posted months ago.
|
|
|
Post by hope on Jan 26, 2021 19:35:20 GMT -6
I agree as well. Why not post the actual reports and let people form their own opinion.
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Jan 29, 2021 9:59:14 GMT -6
Yes because what's more than obvious, from what he's revealed in the post, is what he has not revealed.
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Feb 19, 2021 22:10:25 GMT -6
Josh Hancock produced reports and statements to the public and then they had a discussion. Remember what happened when Josh gave out the anonymous "fingerprints on a bloody glass" info without a report or statement? It turned out not to be true which looked bad for Josh because he had no report to blame it on.
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Mar 9, 2021 14:44:22 GMT -6
Does anyone really believe that Crim, Bradley, or Doug T "falsified" any interviews with Greg or Ricky?? Since they've now been posted has Ricky or Greg come forward to say that these were "falsified"? Is dmac 100% sure that the cassette taped interview he has is the only surviving tape that LE has? Ricky and Greg are alive and KNOW if what has been documented is what was said - if not they should be willing to tell what was said and hope there's no tape to dispute their claims.
|
|
|
Post by hope on Mar 12, 2021 17:54:41 GMT -6
I know I do not believe their interviews were falsified by LE. As you said, if Rick, Greg and/or Justin told the police in 1981 that MMB were in the cabin that night vs. saying they did not see anything/slept the entire time, then I think they would have told somebody over the years.
The easiest thing they could have done over the past decade is say "Yep, it was Marde & Bo. We tried to tell the police back then but were just kids...". No one would have doubted them. By this point everyone was blaming M & B anyway and they had both already passed away. There was no one for them to fear or discount their claim. But instead Rick and Greg have never come forward saying it was MMB or that the police falsified their interviews. It would have put an end to all of it if they had. Instead people have kept digging and adding onto their theories. Now about 20 people, including their sister have been named as involved in the murders. I dunno, I just feel like if they knew (or are not protecting someone else), then they would have come forward to take the heat off Sheila & stop the negative things coming out about their family.
|
|