|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Mar 5, 2019 17:01:25 GMT -6
Assuming the "Reno Counselor" in the anonymous interview on Part II remembers the chronology accurately, then he called DOJ the first week of May 1981 and then [Crim and Bradley] (this guy "remembers" EVERYTHING except their names) came to his office for an interview on May 9 (Saturday.) According the handwritten PCSO report, Cheesman called PCSO Monday May 11. AFTER this interview with C and B.
According the reporter who wrote the April 2011 article where he says he SAW C and B's report of their interview with the Reno therapist, THAT report also stated that MARYLIN called Marty's "therapist" and SHE told him Marty committed these murders." I wonder if HER shrink was Cheesman, and she told CHEESMAN that?
Don't tell me Marylin didn't have a shrink. In Plumas (and Lassen) County, that would be Cheesman. But it's also very possible she called the Reno "therapist" because she was accusing Marty long before the end of April.
|
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Oct 12, 2020 15:44:22 GMT -6
This was such a good thought Tom had of Cheeseman possibly being Marilyn's therapist. Cheeseman and the Reno counselor were neighbors and apparently talked with each other and no doubt had discussed these murders especially if Marilyn was his patient - just a couple weeks after these murders someone from the Vet Center was at the FRC talking about PTSD. There is just little doubt in my mind that when Marty made this undocumented "confession" that the Reno counselor did that "dance" he talked of doing with patients in his outtake - and approached the subject with Marty.
|
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on Oct 18, 2020 19:13:23 GMT -6
What's funny is everyone taking mardes confession as indisputable evidence. All the investigators were supposedly on the take, yet the one person who should have had "copious" notes, chose not to take any? But what really did it for me... marde could have said he smothered tina, stabbed her, fed her to piranhas anything would have made me consider him (or counselor) telling the truth. But no, he claims to have killed her with a hammer. You don't bludgeon someone to death with a hammer on their torso. He was aware from the get go hammers had been used on the others heads, he had no way of knowing that Tina's skull would be found in tact. The only worth in this confession is to show he had no idea how Tina died.
|
|
hope
Full Member
 
Posts: 139
|
Post by hope on Oct 18, 2020 20:11:32 GMT -6
I am with you 1000% Snoho!!! Convenient how that is never mentioned. People only hear how Marde confessed and removed Tina from the scene incapacitated. The most important part is left out, the details of his supposed confession do not match Tina's autopsy results.
|
|