|
|
Post by Admin Horan on May 29, 2017 8:58:29 GMT -6
It might help us if we fully understood how David Craig McNarie (dmac, owner of keddie28.com) obtained the files he uses on his website. McNarie SAYS that, after he saw Josh Hancock's documentary, he contacted Hancock and promised to help him promote his film if Hancock would share the documents with McNarie. (That's a crime, of course.) McNarie says that Josh sent him SOME of the files. Then, McNarie pretty much admits he stabbed Hancock in the back. This is the latest version of the story that McNarie recent posted on MeanKitty's website:
Josh stole them.
Josh Hancock is the felon who stole boxes of shit from PCSO. He sent a few to me, I realized they were originals and Josh was a felon, and I made Gam aware of my predicament and mailed the files I'd superstitiously [he means, "surreptitiously"] gained to GAMBERG
JOSH stole the files
because he thought it was boosting sales. I'd figured out he was a felon thief, and tried to procure more before they "disappeared".
JOSH sent very emotional emails in which he begged for me to send back EVERYTHING he'd EVER SENT, and crying "Gam thinks I stole stuff! I gave them back EVERYTHING!"
All the while I'm holding original photos and original reports he'd stolen and MAILED TO ME, for his own financial gain.
Or, does this mean that McNarie PAID Hancock for the files? That's an even worse crime.
Beyond McNarie's legal problems, this still doesn't explain HOW Josh "stole" the files from PCSO. WHO LET JOSH AND SHEILA INTO THE KEDDIE ROOM?
This (if true) seems to imply that Josh got into some legal hot water, and that's why he has disappeared (I have his contact info, too, but he doesn't respond) from public comment on the case and his documentaries. Also, if this story is true, McNarie is at best, a snitch. No wonder he doesn't have any friends. Now wonder he has to hide his identity.
Now, if "JOSH eventually sent [only] a few to me," then how did McNarie get the REST of the documents he uses?
|
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Jun 7, 2017 9:10:37 GMT -6
According to the Pt.2 Documentary Plumas County Sheriff Greg Hagwood gave them (Josh, Sheila, and Crew?) access to the Keddie murders case files including crime scene photos and interviews with the primary suspects.
We do know that Marty was a suspect and we do have one of his interviews. There were 3 more suspects whose fingerprints were resubmitted for comparison a few years after the murders but we do not have their interviews. If Josh ever had access to those 3 interviews, or the interviews of other key people, he chose not to share them.
|
|
|
|
Post by J17 on Oct 30, 2017 11:22:20 GMT -6
Doesn't matter if you like him or not. I think it is BS that you post this information!
|
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Oct 30, 2017 20:21:16 GMT -6
Justice I know you are talking about Dmac, just not sure what was posted that you found unfair.
This is what I find to be unfair (and premeditated murder also): From 28Facebook page:
Sounds like something a psychopath would post - yet that is just one of MANY premeditated murderous posts that he has written. I find it to be extremely disturbing.
|
|
|
|
Post by J17 on Oct 30, 2017 22:33:38 GMT -6
Justice I know you are talking about Dmac, just not sure what was posted that you found unfair. This is what I find to be unfair (and premeditated murder also): From 28Facebook page: Sounds like something a psychopath would post - yet that is just one of MANY premeditated murderous posts that he has written. I find it to be extremely disturbing. I don't agree with everything he says. I'm not a blind follower. But the fact is Dmac has put himself out there to help solve these horrendous murders. To my knowledge,he has not been paid....Unlike Josh,who was selling books for over $500. Josh Was also spoon feeding information just to lure people in for money. Was he going to give the proceeds to the victims families? NO. Josh didn't care about solving these murders. That's the difference, Dmac DOES. |
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Oct 31, 2017 6:02:02 GMT -6
Thanks for sharing your opinion. The difference in this forum and 28 is you can have an opinion over here. I have no idea how much money Josh made "IF" Josh made any money at all - I'm sure he had a lot of cost tied up in all of that (something that most people never stop to consider). I think 28 finally realized it and had a "GO FUND ME" fund set up - UNBELIEVABLE!! (after all those years of talking about Josh he finally realized that it really does cost money to keep things going). Josh was the thief who stole police documents and Dmac is the thief who kept them - until Mike G. finally sweet talked him out of them.
One bit of info Josh did not spoon to his forum was Sue's glasses laying on the night stand. If they would have READ the Stoy report (which MeanKitty had posted on her forum over a year before Josh posted the picture on FB) they would have realized it themselves. But instead they got mad with him for not giving them the info - when they had it in front of them all along. Maybe Josh did care about solving these murders but knew (firsthand) that he did not have (get, take, or steal) enough information. Dmac care's about about one thing and that is his "theory" which he got from Josh. He has nothing to add to the investigation beyond speculation. Name me one thing he has given to the families of these victims besides a hard time?
By the way I paid over a $100 for a book on the Murder at Cross Bell Ranch - and nobody held me at gun point to make the purchase.
.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Nov 20, 2017 16:16:51 GMT -6
J17:
1. Thanks for your comment!
2. Well, no, McNarie has NOT "put himself out there." He hid behind a fake identity for a lot of years. And behind that identity, he has libeled a lot of people. And FWIW, he finagled his way into Josh and Gamberg's confidence by promising them he could get them on TV (he used to work for a company that produces episodes of shows like Unsolved Mysteries.) That's one of his little "secrets." Was a secret. So, just because he FAILED to make any money, doesn't mean he isn't trying. And I should also point out that he faces zero potential liability for framing two dead guys. You'll notice that a LOT of these TV "documentaries" and "books" do exactly that--frame dead people who can't legally sue. Framing two dead guys as a way to get his face on TV is not the same thing as "trying to solve the crime."
3. Again, thanks for posting. You are very welcome here. But sticking up for McNarie is a waste of time.
|
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on Aug 1, 2018 18:05:41 GMT -6
So most of dmacs page is down, but when I was googled something parts of statements "previews"will pop up. One preview was from dmac stating a huge bundle of goodies had been dropped in his lap. I'll try to find it again because now I'm curious about the date.
|
|
|
|
Post by retiredle on Jan 6, 2019 10:40:03 GMT -6
So most of dmacs page is down, but when I was googled something parts of statements "previews"will pop up. One preview was from dmac stating a huge bundle of goodies had been dropped in his lap. I'll try to find it again because now I'm curious about the date. Snoho17, Were you able to locate this information? |
|
