|
Post by Admin Horan on May 27, 2017 7:56:50 GMT -6
The owner, operator, and snot-nosed bottle washer of keddie28.com is having another public diaper-wetting. This time, over my having a brief chat with him on the phone at his home in ___________, _____. Now, for someone who devotes most of his time to publicly libeling OTHER people, Mr (and I use that term loosely) David Craig McNarie, born April 14, 1965, is a bit touchy about letting People (get it?) know HIS real identity.
Well, Sunshine, that's too bad. You have made yourself a public figure (and, O! what a figure he cuts! snicker) by publicly accusing people of doing naughty things they haven't actually done. That's called libel, and there are civil penalties for that. And the victims of your public campaign to defame people have a right to know your name, your address, and other contact information. So, they are going to know.
How do I know his real name, address, birthday, phone number, and so on? Because I am the "detective" that he PRETENDS to be? Nah. If you are reading this post, then you know how he loooooooves to shit in his own nest, and other People's (get it?) nests. Loose lips, Sunshine. Oh, and his "roommate" (snicker) was also very, very, very, very, very helpful. Very. I can't snicker enough.
Who cares? Well, he's told a lot of porky pies about important information, like, how he got his hot little hands on the files Josh Hancock was allowed to "steal" from PCSO. Some of us would like to know the truth about that. A lot of people reading this post have been childishly shit on by David Craig McNarie, from what he foolishly assumed was his little closet of "anonymity." Hide? Maybe. Run? Never.
I bent over backwards to give him a chance to convince me he had a GOOD reason to keep his identity a secret. On HIS (that is, David Craig McNarie's) OWN website, you can see where that got me. So, here we are. Sauce for the goose, Sunshine. I told you: you can hide, but you can't run.
He's still welcome to participate here. But his posts and everyone else's will be MODERATED.
If anyone is curious about what ELSE David Craig McNarie has to hide, PM me...
|
|
|
Post by cancersucks on May 29, 2017 11:33:02 GMT -6
Good job!
I hope this page can be a non-confrontational place to discuss Keddie!
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on May 29, 2017 13:52:05 GMT -6
Cancersucks: Thanks for joining! Even McNarie is welcome to participate here, but I will moderate everyone's posts as may be necessary.
|
|
|
Post by guest on Jun 21, 2017 16:23:21 GMT -6
You want to look into the case, look at everything instead of formulating a theory and only looking at evidence that supports it and ignoring all that doesn't
|
|
|
Post by Ppanther on Feb 24, 2018 21:06:34 GMT -6
I am proud to have been banned and rudely pm'd by that d***hole:D
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Feb 25, 2018 18:24:44 GMT -6
Hey PinkP!! Where have you been? Glad to see you on this forum.
|
|
|
Post by pinkko on Mar 10, 2018 21:17:25 GMT -6
Kmik, et al. I've missed yiu too:). Lazy as a mo fo is all:/. So did the other 2 sites fold? Horan, thx for this site. Kmik will be/is a good moderator☺
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Mar 10, 2018 21:46:40 GMT -6
Thanks Pp! Mk's forum is still up but nobody posts as she spends much of her time on 28. Meanie's is still up but she no longer posts on it. Glad you are on here with us! Tom has put a lot of time into this.
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Mar 11, 2018 8:02:30 GMT -6
Welcome, pink! Did you listen to the podcasts?
|
|
|
Post by jmo on Apr 1, 2019 21:29:26 GMT -6
Anyone know if McNarie's site is up and running?
|
|
|
Post by karis on Apr 2, 2019 5:38:48 GMT -6
jmo it is not as far as I know. He does occasionally post "jibberish" ramblings on his facebook page. It is entertaining to read.
|
|
|
Post by simon25 on Apr 7, 2019 3:44:35 GMT -6
Thank you Prof. Horan for this forum. I have been following this case for years. I found your podcasts on Youtube and have listened to them more than a few times. Fascinating. Thank you for thinking outside the box and inviting people to offer their own theories of what happened without fear of being attacked.
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Apr 7, 2019 8:05:38 GMT -6
Hi, Simon! Thanks for joining :-)
|
|
|
Post by jmo on Nov 5, 2019 22:22:15 GMT -6
Dmac's recent posts are hurting my face. Seriously. Hurting. My. Face.
Does he never stop?? Why doesn't anyone interview this VIP on what the inside of a box looks like? I. Can't. Even.
I'm so burned out on Marty and Bo. How does he keep going and going and going and going? And, where does he go from here without his "in"?
Just a side note: I really hope Gamberg takes a vacation to ... Canada? (idk. way far up there and super cold) now that he's off the case. He's working it "on his own dime" according to the Big D. News flash: He only accepted dimes. Never spent 'em on this case.
And, Vidq is done because Mike is done?? Well, ain't that a pitty. Crying shame that people saw through all that BS.
How fabulous that Dmac has the floor again. After four blissful months.
Keep working in that box, Dmac. I'm sure all 33 of your loyals will just love it. You da man.
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Nov 6, 2019 3:16:13 GMT -6
JMO, Dmac has the floor on FB and not his "now defunct" forum because that's what his following has dwindled down to - Facebookers. That way he can quickly delete anyone who's opinion differs from his.
Vidocq did exactly what you said they do - dinner and pointers. Mike need not spend his time or dime on a case that he spent little time on while on PCSO dime until the 2016 Plumas News article and the ID Show. Only then did he take the time to grab 28's opinion which is what any podcast on the case (with the exception of Tom's) always does. They grab enough info for a 30 minute show never researching all of the available info so it's just a "regurgitation" of 28's opinion and the documentaries to tell the story and move on to the next podcast. This case will probably never be solved but Mike served a purpose for PCSO after all the interest stirred by the documentaries. Mike was there as a way of saying yes this case is still "actively" being investigated. Especially useful around 2016 when the news articles and magazine articles were written, and tv show was made. The 2018 series of Plumas News Articles written did nothing for the case but win an award for Victoria Metcalf.
I find it interesting that Dmac is now saying the boys were in the closet. I believe his opinion of Marilyn babysitting the boys that night stems from this 2011 chat where a poster who had known Marilyn in the past posted this:
There it is somebody actually saying that Marty was not the reason the boys lived because he didn't care about Justin. But if Marilyn was there to babysit the boys then she would have also been babysitting Tina -and let's face it she didn't even babysit Casey that night. My take on these posts are that Marilyn was a liar and loved all the men so she would have had no problem pointing the finger at Marty as she moved in with Wade Meeks. Now it's interesting to me that she said Justin was screwed up and lacked a conscience which was created by the lack of bonding with his lying mama (which I believe). Seems to me she was also saying Justin, not Marilyn or Marty, was like the killers we read about.
I only hope 28 keeps pushing how well the therapist memory was in 2009! Maybe he needs to watch the therapist outtakes again. What the therapist told Josh and what he told the DOJ was obviously 28 years worth of difference. Remember Josh didn't have a 1981 statement from the therapist when he reached out to him for the documentary. How many times did they talk before they recorded the therapist? How much information on Marty had Josh shared with the therapist before they recorded his memories? This is from a 2011 chat by Josh Hancock after the 30 anniversary article written by Josh Seabold:
I don't think Josh Hancock had a clue when he talked with the therapist in 2009 that the PCSO had the follow up report written by the DOJ in 1981. I also don't think the therapist intentionally lied to Josh but was relying on his 28 year old memory and the info Josh was giving him.
The therapist (according to Josh Hancock) went to the PCSO after he had let Josh record his story in 2009 and told this story to the PCSO. The problem is they didn't know the PCSO had the follow up report from 1981. I'm 99% sure Karis and I know who the therapist is and this va center was for any vet who walked in off the street - very informal.
|
|