Recently Updated Posts

Serial killer J.R. Robinson was Presbyterian as well. This guy was a piece of work, I read a book about him years ago. He took church money to fund all kinds of illegal businesses, like a "woman's shelter" where he picked a couple of his victims......"His neighbors knew J.R. as a successful businessman and entrepreneur, always talking of new ventures. He was a neighborhood activist, an officer of the residents’ association, and chairman of its rules committee. He was also a founding elder of the nearby Presbyterian Church."

Another Presbyterian killer......."Yet, this attack at the Chabad of Poway synagogue in California stirred particular interest and questions among Christians since the suspect, 19-year-old John Earnest, was reported to belong to a Presbyterian church. In fact, he was apparently a member of a nearby congregation in my own denomination, the Orthodox Presbyterian Church (OPC"

Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh, we're going to talk about Access Graphics and kiddie porn. For now, let's talk about Fleet II attaching himself to the Ramseys like a barnacle, then throwing them overboard. IFYKWIM.

Specifically, Fleet III is K Street's Navy salesman in the Senate. It would seem he was groomed for that from an early age. You don't suddenly decide to go to those schools on a whim. It takes years to plan that path, and years to advance along it. Fleet III started on that path not long after JonBenet died. Was Burke supposed to be Fleet III? The murder of JBR wasn't done just for kicks. If these people are part of a cult, then her sacrifice was intended to increase someone's power. Or block someone's power. Whose?

I made a big deal on the podcast (and will again) about the Arlis Perry murder being BOTH a sex magick ritual, AND a simultaneous sacrificial murder. If I understand it correctly, Crowleyism teaches that the best place to perform a sex magick ritual is on the site of violent death, as much and as violent as possible. Crowley suggested a battlefield would be perfect. Not only a LOT of pain and death, but most of the victims would be considered more or less virtuous. That is, a battlefield is not like a place of execution, where those killed are criminals or evildoers. The more death, the more pain and torture, the more INNOCENT, the better. And the sooner after the battle, the better, before the energy drains away.

Suppose you don't have a "battlefield" handy? You have to create one. Like at Cielo Drive? It seems possible that Altobelli and Melcher were literally rushing to reoccupy the house before the blood dried. And they were apparently in a sexual relationship. And both of them were HUNGRY for more Hollyweird power in their careers. The victims died slowly, horribly, and extremely violently. Crowley would surely certify the site as sex-magick ready.

At the Perry murder scene, which is undoubtedly not only Satanic, but specifically, Crowleyesque, we find blood and semen in ritualistic locations. This was not "only" a human sacrifice. It was ALSO A SEX MAGICK RITUAL. An altar candle was used to violate Arliss. (There was no definite sign of "regular" rape.) The murder provides the violent death; the Church location provides the Innocence. I still wonder if Arlis's marriage had been consummated.

At the JonBenet scene, there was blood and--what??? The autopsy revealed the presence of a fluid consistent with semen or saliva all over her thigh/loin area, which, along with the blood, had been "wiped off" with a DARK colored cloth. Her original panties, and that cloths, were never found. Where did they go? You don't have to be a "cult" expert to know that a black cloth soaked in the blood of a child and the semen of the men who raped and tortured her to death sounds like just the thing to bring to a Black Mass. And "they" did it on FUCKING CHRISTMAS DAY. You've seen The Wicker Man, right? What day of the year is the sacrificial Fool sacrificed, again? 

The pathologist never actually got around to saying exactly WHY the fluid "wasn't" semen, and was "probably" saliva. In 1996, the most definitive test was for signs of a protein that causes the semen to change viscosity over time. The pathologist was not able to recover enough dried fluid in order to perform any such conclusive test one way or the other. And that's a hell of a lot of "saliva." So, it COULD have been semen. (One DNA expert argues that the most recent DNA test showed the DNA of TWO or more men.) And bear in mind, one ME bent over backwards to avoid seeing ANY evidence of PRIOR sexual abuse, and tried and tried to downplay the "rape" angle of the case. Another ME was far more willing to state it HAD occurred. In ANY case, there was no doubt JBR had been brutally violated. A splinter of varnished wood was found inside her vaginal tract. We have no idea what the posture of her little body was, because the body was moved by her "father." It IS funny that her panites were gone, but not her pajama pants. Had she and her PJ pants been laid out in the same pattern as Arlis? We'll never know. But "somebody" dressed her in new panties (that only a parent would have been able to find) and put her PJ pants back on. My point is, her panties (and the cloth used to clean her up) were gone, but not the pants. And her death was PROLONGED with a garotte.

Supposedly, there were drops of blood from an unidentifiable "male" on the NEW panties. How did the "killer" cut himself, when no sharp weapons were used on the victim? The "save the Ramseys at all costs" team purport that this blood came from a cut from the glass in the broken basement window, but there was an intact spider web just outside the window, and NO other blood spots anywhere else in the basement. Did the sacrificers prick themselves to get some of their own blood to mix with JBR's blood? BUT--"Satanic" or not--JBR's torture, rape, and murder were "ritualistic" by any forensic definition of the word.

And the two PRIME suspects were men (with ambitious wives) hungry for all the power they could get. And got. Was this some kind of weird "spirit marriage" between JBR (a "shakhti") and Fleet III? If that sounds crazy, let me direct you to what we KNOW about this crime. You pick a saner motive.

Like I said, Access Graphics will come up again...

That would be very interesting if Gwen Krebs happened to know Marjorie Cameron. The fact that Cameron stayed at a ranch nearby combined with all the other connections to the Manson group does make it very likely that if Gwen knew Cappie Gillies, she knew Cameron also.

It does seem to me like John Ramsey was the money man of the pedophile group. Actually, Nancy Krebs talked about something like this, saying that "Uncle Johnny" (i.e. John Ramsey) was the one who set up front companies to launder proceeds from child pornography. I wouldn't even be surprised if Access Graphics was really being used for this purpose, with its massive $1 billion in revenue. Fleet Jr., like you say, doesn't seem to have had an actual job, just the financial backing of his father who actually held the purse strings. Indeed, I suspect that Fleet Sr. wielded his financial control to get Fleet Jr. to move to Boulder to be closer to him in Aspen, maybe for the purposes of this pedophile ring. I'll have to check my notes but I heard that some tabloid reporter managed to get ahold of a recording of Fleet Sr. and Jr. heatedly arguing over something after JonBenet's murder.

Fleet III's background is really fascinating indeed. That just goes to show the level of connections that this group had. I don't know if you've noticed, but his LinkedIn page has recently been taken down.