|
|
Post by elantric on Oct 18, 2020 9:34:59 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by elantric on Oct 18, 2020 9:13:49 GMT -6
This is a video shot in 1994. It presents a widely vilified & disparaged viewpoint within the LGBT community. This group was officially banned from marching in the official 1994 Pride Parade in NYC. Tom Reeves died in either 2013 or 2012.
|
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Oct 18, 2020 9:11:02 GMT -6
Justin told so many stories that anything he says now is considered completely unreliable and untruthful. If we had dates on these interviews it might help to know how and why his stories evolved. In one interview with Doug he's talking about one man and then all of the sudden there's two - now we have three. My theory changes daily but if there were really three men that came into that house I just can't imagine that being over anything but drugs.
Why did the 3 boys live? Dmac says because Justin surprised Marty and Marilyn by being in 28 - what a stretch - and we now know he'd been there the night before also. The question is why were the "boys" not "boy" spared but not Tina. If it was over drugs then she possibly knew who these people were - maybe the boys did not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Oct 18, 2020 9:04:58 GMT -6
31 "Steven Palazzo" is actually "Karate Dave". 52 is, indeed, Bill Vance. But no one knows for sure what his real name really is. 58 I dooooooon't think is Zero. I could be wrong.
When "Phil Phillips" (Bill Vance) described Charlie in prison as "just someone to make fun of and use" I think he's telling the truth. He sure used Charlie when he got out. Not one story about Charlie manipulating one single solitary inmate into killing another (that happens in prison the same way it happens outside, except it's some prison "bitch" starting trouble between cons. Charlie was definitely bisexual. But not one single solitary story about him causing any trouble in the jug. Not one. Except the accusation that he once raped another boy at knife point. But even it it's true, he may have been forced into doing it by other prisoners.) It's funny that Vance's parole wasn't revoked, either. Funny, because he participates here in Bugliosi's propaganda film about Charlie.
That's a "Gurkha" knife Squeaky is playing with in that scene right before the scene with and about the Tibetan Book of the Dead. All of their "Death" talk is Americanized readings from that book. Nominally, the Gurkha are "Tibetan Buddhists" but that's like saying "Satanic Christian." Naropa University and Shambalha in Boulder Co is, of course, "Tibetan Buddhist."
And clearly, there is nothing wrong with Clem's intelligence.
Here's another thing--in a movie that's supposed to explain their motive for "murdering" people, I don't hear any talk about murdering people. And those one or two lines about "we'll kill anyone who gets in our way..." Who the fuck got in their way? Nobody. The whole point of moving out to Death Valley is there was literally no one else out there to get in their way. The sheriff of Inyo County only got in their way because--supposedly--the Family stole some cars and set fire to a government bulldozer. But let's all remember one thing--the only other people anywhere near Barker Ranch were the prospectors who WANTED THE FAMILY GONE. "Charlie was just somebody the rest of us made fun of and used..."
That opening line by Sandy Good about "there is no wrong. If someone needs to be killed..." was not Manson's philosophy. It was the philosophy of the "Green Berets." In Apocalypse Now, Colonel Kurtz's comments along those lines are NOT his own crazy mumblings. They were official SOG policy. Coincidentally, it's also the core belief of Scientology. Supposedly, Sandy was "Charlie's most devoted follower..." Maybe. Or, maybe, she was just on her own trip to a great extent. A lot of celebrities have stalkers. No one blamed Jodie Foster when Hinckley shot Reagan.
The Waffen SS counterinsurgency manual was translated into English and adopted first by the US Special Forces (in German, "Einsatzkommando") in the Far East (beginning in the Philippines) and is now used by the entire US military in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other places where we are fighting "Muslim insurgents."
Like the SS, The Special Forces actively sought out and recruited what we would call sociopaths for their officer corps. Colonel Kurtz's "problem" is that he is NOT a sociopath. I think the subtext of his problems volunteering for the Special Forces came down to that. Not his age. But he had such a stellar record they could no longer turn him down. But when he realizes that he is not as ruthless as he is expected to be (he literally breaks down and sobs over the children having their arms cut off) he has an identity crisis. His "ruthlessness" from then on is neurotic, not genuinely sociopathic. He remains tortured by the paradox (that means nothing to the rest of Special Forces) as we hear when he asks, "What do you call it when the assassins accuse the assassin?" We call it "hypocrisy." But he can't consciously accept that he has dedicated his whole life (and literally busted his ass) for the sake of a massive hypocrisy. That's why he wants Willard to kill him. He can no longer stand himself at all.
The best scene in the whole movie is the scene where Willard is being briefed for his mission by the General. It sounds like the General is "praising" Kurtz's humanity, his wit, his humor. But he isn't. He's listing Kurtz's defects (from the point of view of SF.) His worst crime, of course, is believing in the Cause for which he thinks he's supposed to be fighting. Even worse, he thinks he's supposed to be WINNING the war. And the worst part is, he IS winning the war. And he must be stopped.
John Milius put a lot of the same stuff in another one of his screenplays, the script for Patton (Coppola worked on that script, too.) Milius's Patton is trapped in the same dilemma as Kurtz. The Good Soldier, Patton naively thinks he's supposed to win the war. He simply doesn't understand that "some things are more important than victory."
|
|
Omega
Full Member
 
Posts: 121
|
Post by Omega on Oct 18, 2020 8:17:25 GMT -6
What is amazing also is that the cover date is October 1969. Usually with monthly magazines/newspapers, the cover date is on the stands a month or two (or more) prior. Murders happened in early August and these theories are already out there on the "streets" by October (if not earlier) Also, found the following from your good old buddy, Mae Brussels (the gift that keeps on giving!) "It's very interesting in my research on the assassinations that the very first man to publish an article on the Sharon Tate murder in my collection of the murders, before they had a suspect—the murders were in August, and they found the suspects in December—was a man named Ed Butler. In October '69 he wrote an article. The man who publishes the newspaper that he writes for is Patrick Frawley of Schick Razor and Technicolor, who is one of the third largest supporters of Richard Nixon—a far right-wing person. And he hires Ed Butler to write articles for him. Ed is an agent provaceteur who worked with Lee Harvey Oswald in New Orleans. When Oswald had the cover story that he was a communist, Ed Butler made a record for him. [This was] when Oswald said he was a member of the Fair Play for Cuba [Committee]. And he was the only member of the New Orleans area, and Ed Butler knew it. Ed Butler worked with Lee Harvey Oswald, so it's interesting that in 1969 the first person who has an opinion on who murdered these seven people would be Ed Butler; In my collection of articles we have Ed Butler. Now, what is this article called? It says Did Hate Kill Tate? And he goes into the fact that the Black Panthers are tied into the communists, and the evidence is that the Panthers killed these people; [they came] into middle class America and spread terror"
Full transcript here:
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Oct 18, 2020 7:47:06 GMT -6
Jebus! Great work, as usual!
Nother words, Susan Atkins could easily have read or heard about this theory BEFORE she started blabbing to her cellmates. Funny, that.
It's also funny that this issue of this "news" paper had a feature story about some [Neo?] Nazis. And an article warning about the "Rise of the militant Jew." 16 will get 20 that Butler knew the Nazis, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin Horan on Oct 18, 2020 7:34:01 GMT -6
Remember when my former heroes James Randi and Martin Gardner turned CSICOP into a propaganda machine for "false memory syndrome?" There was a LOT of money behind CSICOP all of a sudden. I interviewed Gardner about that for Alternet. Specifically, I cross-examined him over a series of "articles" CSICOP published in their journal The Skeptical Inquirer (I had written an article exposing "magnetic laundry balls" for them that they ended up not publishing because they suddenly became this pedophile defending flack shop) claiming that they "could not find one case of adults accusing their parents of sexual abuse that was backed up by corroborating evidence." I told Gardner I found 700 cases in 15 minutes that were backed up by medical records, school records, and police reports. His answer was, "Well, we researched this the best we could over two years, and we never found any such cases." I said, "Well, here's a list of 700 of them. Are you going to publish it in TSI?" And his answer was, "We've moved on to other subjects." Then I reeeeeeeeeeaaaaally let him have it about him and Randi being my heroes. He mumbled some excuses about big money taking over CSICOP and TSI. Alternet ended up not publishing the interview/article because of massive pressure from the "donors" at CSICOP. And theeeeeeeen it turned out Randi and Gardner were pederasts themselves. IIRC, it turned out they were both members of NAMBLA and Randi was currently facing charges for stalking a 14-year-old boy.
Anyhoo, looking back on it, I suddenly realized something--the "experts" they were quoting (and who were testifying for the defense in some of these trials) must have learned about the idea of "planting false memories" from SOMEWHERE. Know what I mean? And all of this started right after the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. IIRC, some of the same "experts" were involved in police questioning of Burke Ramsey. My notes are looooooooooooooooong gone, but I'll see if I can find the names of those "experts."
|
|
hope
Full Member
 
Posts: 139
|
Post by hope on Oct 18, 2020 2:50:29 GMT -6
Interesting snoho... what did Justin/Marilyn say about 3 men? Or do you happen to have a link? I've been down the old stuff rabbit hole too lol. Lots of little tid bits hidden throughout those old forums. Too bad a lot of the stuff from way back was lost.
And I hear ya guys! I go back and forth all the time. Each person had reasons they could have been the target. I may lean slightly towards one more than the others but I'm not sold on anything. And the suspects, no one is truthful and everyone seems shady & suspect to me.
I wish more people would talk/post as well. Poor Kathy. It is sad, these people deserve justice.
|
|
hope
Full Member
 
Posts: 139
|
Meeks
Oct 18, 2020 2:30:48 GMT -6
Post by hope on Oct 18, 2020 2:30:48 GMT -6
I had the same impression as you did of Marilyn. And mama meeks certainly did not help with that confusion, causing Marilyn to second guess herself and her memories.
Excellent point on the BB gun!!! You're right it is more likely that it belonged to one of the Meeks boys since that event took place at their house. It would be nice to see the police report of the incident, and if the Meeks were ever questioned if they owned a bb gun after the murders.
|
|
|
|
Meeks
Oct 18, 2020 0:36:26 GMT -6
via mobile
hope likes this
Post by snoho17 on Oct 18, 2020 0:36:26 GMT -6
Been going over Marilyn's old posts. It really is to bad she got chased away, she really came across as very open, if sometimes admittedly confused. She even helped and corrected dmac on things. Anyway, she talks about the incident with the BB gun at the meeks place. I certainly got the impression the bb gun belonged one of the meeks boys. I'm assuming there was a police report involved. I wonder if the police asked about a scope after the murders. I, my siblings, neighbor kids all had bb guns back in the day, and I don't remember ever seeing one with a scope. I know I would have been pretty impressed if anyone had.
|
|
|
|
Silveria
Oct 17, 2020 23:31:57 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by snoho17 on Oct 17, 2020 23:31:57 GMT -6
He confessed, nobody can seem to put him away at the time. I know he was questioned while in custody, I believe he confessed to a cell mate. He claimed at the time to have killed 22 and been present for the murders of 18. For some reason, I feel like it might be possible to connect him to Dana.
|
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on Oct 17, 2020 23:24:19 GMT -6
Well I've been reading up on old stuff once again, it seems justin at least told his mother there were 3 men. It seemed to be excepted back in the day that there were 3.
|
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on Oct 17, 2020 23:19:19 GMT -6
Marilyn posted on an old board, archived by MK. She's asked if marde really did stay with Doug Thomas. Marilyn answers, "no that was justin".
|
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Oct 17, 2020 19:33:28 GMT -6
So many questions. Justin witnessed something, Greg said he witnessed something, Justin said he saw Tina, Greg said he didn't, yet no mention of Ricky being seen or seeing anything. Was the target Tina, the boys, Sue? Oh my gosh so confusing and then take into account when these interviews were conducted (before or after the Marty talk got around town) and how much of what was being said was pure rumor. I believe the talk about Tina was probably pretty close to the truth - but that's going by snippets of what someone said and not a full interview.
What's really baffling to me is that this case is almost 40 years old and in a lot of cold/old cases people from the area where the crime happened will usually post what was known or thought at the time of the murders. But not the Keddie Murders - it's nothing but silence - same for Kathy Howard's murder - it's almost like they never happened BUT THEY DID and the silence wont make them go away.
I'm shocked that Dmac was handed over case files, and I certainly don't agree with much of anything he says, and he suffers greatly from "tunnel vision" but hey if nothing else maybe he can get a foot in the door with the Kathy Howard case - I'd love to know more about it - or ANYTHING at all about it. It's time somebody starting asking what happened to these people. Unbelievable that the Kathy Howard case is almost 48 years old and nothing has been said about it practically since it happened- - Dear God somebody knows something and do these people not have a conscience???
PEOPLE if you live in PLUMAS COUNTY start asking what happened to Tina, Sue, Johnny and Dana!!! Start asking what happened to Kathy Howard!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on Oct 17, 2020 18:04:33 GMT -6
So I feel like I just returned full circle. Tina as the target. 2 of the boys witnessed and were allowed to live. Did Rick give any descriptions of the 3 men? Like Justin, he'd know if it was marde bo and  ?marylyn. My guess is he probably didn't know them. Tina's sexually active at 12, I can understand keeping that info on the d.l. acid party at walkes, stolen acid,multiple baby daddy's. Justin saw Tina but rick didn't? Why didn't Justin ever discuss rick being present? And why didn't Justin see this 3rd man?
|
|