Post by kmik on Mar 31, 2019 16:55:31 GMT -6
Hey Ck we're glad your here. As Tom said there doesn't seem to be any evidence of an outside intruder, or more importantly there doesn't appear to be any evidence that Marty was there. There should be some DNA (blood on the cabinet door, bloody print on the back stairwell, fingernail scrappings, etc.) and DNA testing has come so far like DNA testing through genealogy websites.
Who gave Johnny and Dana a ride home has been important to everyone who has ever looked at or heard of this case until 2017 when 28 announced that this person had been identified and vetted, by him and Gamberg, and they had nothing to do with the murders. But the point is whoever gave them a ride 38 years ago talked to the police in 1981 (according to 28 and Gam) and told them that Marty and Sue were seeing each other but DID NOT tell what the police had begged to know, "Who gave the boys a ride". Why in the world not give that info to the police in 1981 instead of 2017 so that they could establish a timeline of exactly when the boys arrived home and to rule out the murders possibly occurring by whoever took them home? To me it doesn't matter if they are innocent - their credibility as far as what they told in 1981, without a doubt, should be questioned.
The ID Show did absolutely no research on their own and it showed. They missed several opportunities to ask questions and trip up some of these myths that have now become gospel - the same thing that happened when Josh did the documentaries - not enough knowledge or research. But Josh's documentaries are the reason my sister and I joined a forum - so it was a good start.