Post by poweranni on Jun 22, 2018 23:16:23 GMT -6
Another thing I have been pondering (so please don’t take my head off) is that a sexual assault on Sue really can’t be ruled out just because LE didn’t find semen. The attack may have been interrupted by the boys’ entry into the house before any kind penetration or ejaculation happened. Sue was killed wearing a Muu Muu (not the most flattering or sexy garment but comfy) and a bra. Sue was petite and it doesn’t appear that she was physically endowed enough in the chest area to require wearing a bra at night. It’s just a guess, but I think that she was wearing the panties (that was later used as a gag) and bra for modesties sake because the neighbor boys Dana and Justin were staying in the house that night. Also, the underwear had to be removed before the tape was placed around her ankles or you wouldn’t be able to get them off. If someone was trying to stage the underwear they would have had to go into the girls bedroom and riffle through multiple drawers trying to find Sue’s underwear verses Sheila’s or Tina’s. That would have been one really calm killer(s) if he/she took the time not to make a mess out of searching those drawers.
It is remarkable to me that LE didn't search every nook and corner. I really is odd.
Curious what you think,
Just Curious
Is there a reason for why she wouldn't be wearing underwear, for comfort?
Why would she be wearing underwear to bed, for modesty?
Were the young men wearing underwear? And if so, was it because there was a woman in the house?
Am I missing something here?

