Post by karis on Apr 13, 2018 21:30:29 GMT -6
I've taken quotes from the recent news article and compared them to news articles from 2016.
Quote from the recent article:
Gamberg was a deputy with the Plumas County Sheriff’s Office prior to the murders, he said. Then he got fired. When he was reinstated, Thomas kept him out of the investigation. Even his leads in the case were ignored.
According to the FRB May, 25, 1983 Mike Gamberg was reinstated as Deputy of Plumas County after being terminated March 9,1981. Mike Gamberg was never kept out of the investigation by Doug Thomas because Doug Thomas resigned 3 months after the murders to take another job and Mike Gamberg had been fired a month before the murders. So Doug and Mike never worked at the PCSO together after the murders were committed.
Quote from Mike in the recent article:
“There are people locally who know more than they’ve said, and I believe we’ve identified some of them, and we know who they are, and we know where they are.
They have been saying this since 2016!! Either do it or hand this case to someone who will.
Quote from Mike in May 2016:
“Several other people are involved, and they’re still alive,” Gamberg said Tuesday. “We have most of them identified, and we’re coming for them.
“They better batten down the hatches because we’re coming,” he said. “We’re continuing with the investigation, and we’re doing interviews, and we have several persons of interest.
From the recent article:
From a 2016 news article:
In the coming days, the hammer and knife will be scoured for any possible DNA evidence, and the tape will be examined by the FBI to see if there’s a possible voice-match with anyone who has already been interviewed in connection with this case.
How did "his" piece of DNA get processed any quicker than the other pieces of evidence? And what was his piece of DNA?
From the recent article:
When he was reinstated, Thomas kept him out of the investigation. Even his leads in the case were ignored.
As a Quincy deputy who knew many of the area residents, understood and had experience in homicide investigation, and as someone who knew at least two of the victims, he believes his input should have been taken seriously.
From the PON List:
Heard Tina molested by French who just released from jail & could be killer, discussed info with Gamberg
Was this the lead he felt was ignored?
From the recent article:
While the crime was being reported, Jamie Seabolt, Sheila Sharp and possibly Zonita Seabolt helped the three young boys out a side bedroom window of the cabin.
"Possibly"? How in the world can they solve this case if they can't even solve who pulled the 3 boys out of the window?
From the recent article:
Neither Hagwood nor Gamberg are willing to divulge specifics on whom they’re watching, but new evidence has given them solid leads.
Why can't they divulge specifics to the Plumas News? They've been divulging it with 28 for years.
From the recent article:
He’s also shared some important information with the Plumas County Sheriff’s Office. Although dmac and Gamberg have some differences of opinion of just what happened in Cabin 28, Gamberg has come to respect dmac’s work.
Tom you were absolutely right! Gamberg is the source of this info being leaked. It is clear to us now that he has been working with Dmac for years - or better yet he's been working THROUGH Dmac for years. The puzzle is coming together now. Dmac has been Mike's puppet since the puppet strings were cut off Josh Hancock. Although I don't agree with most of his post I'd like to think Dmac is smarter than that. I guess we can now merge the two into one username: DMike